From: Dylan Penhale <dylanpenhale@(email surpressed)> Subject: Start-middle-end frame rendering. Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 21:58:18 -0500 |
Msg# 1218 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Hi all We are just about to look into modifying our 3D submit scripts to render the first-middle-last frames first then fill in the gaps, but before we do I thought I would ask if there is already a way to do this? I can't see any reason why this couldn't be a default behaviour, but an option to toggle it would probably be best. Thanks in advance. Dylan Penhale Fuel International |
From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Start-middle-end frame rendering. Date: Tue, 07 Feb 2006 22:11:49 -0500 |
Msg# 1219 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Dylan Penhale wrote: We are just about to look into modifying our 3D submit scripts to render the first-middle-last frames first then fill in the gaps, but before we do I thought I would ask if there is already a way to do this? I can't see any reason why this couldn't be a default behaviour, but an option to toggle it would probably be best. If the frame range is 1-100, then you could submit the start/middle/end by specifying the following at the 'Frames:' prompt: Frames: 1 50 100 2-49 51-99 Batching: 1 (note spaces). This should yield a frame list that looks like this: 0001 0050 0100 0002 0003 0004 .. 0048 0049 0051 0052 .. 0098 0099 If you want to some how automate this, you can tweak the script to either break out the frame range into bits, or invoke 'rush -reorder' from within the script, after the job has been submitted: http://www.seriss.com/rush-current/rush/rush-command-line-options.html#-reorder ..just parse the output of 'rush -lf', grab the first/middle/last frames, then call 'rush -reorder <first> <middle> <last>' to get those frames to appear first. Gets complicated if you want to also support batching. -- Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed) Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/ Tel: (Tel# suppressed) Cel: (Tel# suppressed) Fax: (Tel# suppressed) |
From: Dylan Penhale <dylanpenhale@(email surpressed)> Subject: RE: Start-middle-end frame rendering. Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2006 01:30:18 -0500 |
Msg# 1220 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Perfect! Thanks Greg |-----Original Message----- |From: Greg Ercolano [mailto:erco@(email surpressed)] |Sent: Wednesday, 8 February 2006 2:12 PM |To: void@(email surpressed) |Subject: Re: Start-middle-end frame rendering. | |[posted to rush.general] | |Dylan Penhale wrote: |> We are just about to look into modifying our 3D submit scripts to |> render the first-middle-last frames first then fill in the gaps, but |> before we do I thought I would ask if there is already a way to do |> this? I can't see any reason why this couldn't be a default |behaviour, |> but an option to toggle it would probably be best. | | If the frame range is 1-100, then you could submit the |start/middle/end | by specifying the following at the 'Frames:' prompt: | |Frames: 1 50 100 2-49 51-99 |Batching: 1 | | (note spaces). This should yield a frame list that |looks like this: | |0001 |0050 |0100 |0002 |0003 |0004 |.. |0048 |0049 |0051 |0052 |.. |0098 |0099 | | If you want to some how automate this, you can tweak the script | to either break out the frame range into bits, or |invoke 'rush -reorder' | from within the script, after the job has been submitted: | |http://www.seriss.com/rush-current/rush/rush-command-line-optio |ns.html#-reorder | ..just parse the output of 'rush -lf', grab the |first/middle/last frames, | then call 'rush -reorder <first> <middle> <last>' to |get those frames to | appear first. | | Gets complicated if you want to also support batching. | |-- |Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed) |Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/ |Tel: (Tel# suppressed) |Cel: (Tel# suppressed) |Fax: (Tel# suppressed) | |