From: Mathieu Xavier Mauser <mathieuxaviermauser@(email surpressed)> Subject: Lightwave Network Rendering Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:02:54 -0400 |
Msg# 1308 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
HiI've scoured the rush newsgroup and I gather the consensus is that no one is using Rush to render Lightwave 8.5 on Macs? Because 'lswn' is broke on the Mac OS X version, i.e. Terminal will not execute lswn! Is the bulk of Lightwave rendering done with Windows now? Or linux? Are all the plugins still only for windows? I was hoping Rush would work, but unless Lightwave 9 changes things in the Mac version, then I will have to figure out how Lightwave handles network renders itself. Any pointers from Lightwave users? Thanks, Mat X |
From: Victor DiMichina <victor@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Lightwave Network Rendering Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:07:24 -0400 |
Msg# 1309 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Mathieu Xavier Mauser wrote: [posted to rush.general] HiI've scoured the rush newsgroup and I gather the consensus is that no one is using Rush to render Lightwave 8.5 on Macs? Because 'lswn' is broke on the Mac OS X version, i.e. Terminal will not execute lswn!Is the bulk of Lightwave rendering done with Windows now? Or linux? Are all the plugins still only for windows? Although some users have had a measure of success with Mac & Linux (more on Linux), the most success we've had with Lightwave is under Windows. Plugins are more readily available under Windows as well. Vic |
From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Lightwave Network Rendering Date: Tue, 06 Jun 2006 14:59:04 -0400 |
Msg# 1311 View Complete Thread (3 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Victor DiMichina wrote: Although some users have had a measure of success with Mac & Linux (more on Linux), the most success we've had with Lightwave is under Windows. Plugins are more readily available under Windows as well. If /anyone/ has had success getting command line rendering of Lightwave working on the mac, please show the command line you're using. I've seen two folks who can't get the Mac's LWSN executable to run at all from the command line; here's a previous thread from the newsgroup: http://seriss.com/cgi-bin/rush/newsgroup-threaded.cgi?-view+1075+1075+1076+1079+1077+1078+1080+1081+1082+1083+1084+1085+1087+1088+1089+1086 Sorry I keep forgetting Mac/LightWave has this problem. Essentially it comes down to this: $ cd "/Applications/LightWave [8]/programs" $ ./lwsn -3 /var/tmp/foo.lws 1 10 1 -bash: ./lwsn: cannot execute binary file $ ls -la [..] -rwxrwxrwx 1 root admin 460643 Oct 4 2005 LWSN <-- -rwxrwxrwx 1 root admin 0 Oct 9 2004 LWSN cmdLine $ file ./LWSN ./LWSN: header for PowerPC PEF executable Apparently 'open LWSN' works, and it's possible the intention of the 'LWSN cmdLine' file is that you put your command line options into that file, then 'open LWSN', and it goes off and renders. I haven't tried this, but the above thread seems to mention something like this. So I'm imagining, I dunno, something like: $ cd "/Applications/LightWave [8]/programs" $ echo '-3 /var/tmp/foo.lws 1 10 1' > "LWSN cmdLine" $ open LWSN Trouble with this is, that even if it works, the 'open LWSN' will surely background itself, such that rush won't know when its done rendering. Also, such an approach doesn't allow for multiple processor rendering. (ie. there's only one "LWSN cmdLine" file to work with) -- Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed) Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/ Tel: (Tel# suppressed) Cel: (Tel# suppressed) Fax: (Tel# suppressed)(new) |