From: Marco Recuay <marco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Log scrolling Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:42:49 -0400 |
Msg# 1835 View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
I was wondering if it is possible to disable, or speed up, IRush log
playback. Our Maya renders spit out an ungodly amount of info, which is
good for problem-solving, but it takes a long time to reach the end of
the file.
If we just navigate to the log location we can open it in a text editor immediately and read it there, but that is a cumbersome process to repeat often. Disabling log tailing will stop the automatic scroll, but the log file is not loaded immediately, you still have to wait for the log to chug along to the bottom. Any ideas? Marco |
From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Log scrolling Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:37 -0400 |
Msg# 1836 View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Marco Recuay wrote: > I was wondering if it is possible to disable, or speed up, IRush log > playback. Our Maya renders spit out an ungodly amount of info, which is > good for problem-solving, but it takes a long time to reach the end of > the file. Yes; if by playback you mean the auto-tailing feature, you can disable that via "Edit -> Preferences -> Tail Logs" > If we just navigate to the log location we can open it in a text editor > immediately and read it there, but that is a cumbersome process to > repeat often. Next release of irush will actually have a popup menu for alternately viewing the log in a separate editor (that you can set, eg. gvim/wordpad/TextEditor, etc) > Disabling log tailing will stop the automatic scroll, but the log file > is not loaded immediately, you still have to wait for the log to chug > along to the bottom. > > Any ideas? Hmm, which version of Rush are you running, and on which platform? You can find out inside irush via "Help -> About Irush", and include the version number here, which will be something like 102.42aXX There were a few versions where the log tailing feature was slower than other releases, so upgrading may help solve that. Given the version info, I can probably tell you if you can upgrade just the irush tool, without having to upgrade the rest. -- Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed) Seriss Corporation Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/ Tel: (Tel# suppressed) Fax: (Tel# suppressed) Cel: (Tel# suppressed) |
From: Marco Recuay <marco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Log scrolling Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:53:28 -0400 |
Msg# 1837 View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
We're using version 102.42a8.I had already turned off log tailing like you'd mentioned, but reading in the logs still happens progressively. The larger the log, the more it slows down it seems. Granted, this was a 10mb log file (!), but the way it was loading the log line by line seemed odd to me. Marco On 2009-04-13 21:00:37 -0700, Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> said: Hmm, which version of Rush are you running, and on which platform? You can find out inside irush via "Help -> About Irush", and include the version number here, which will be something like 102.42aXX There were a few versions where the log tailing feature was slower than other releases, so upgrading may help solve that. Given the version info, I can probably tell you if you can upgrade just the irush tool, without having to upgrade the rest. |
From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> Subject: Re: Log scrolling Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:39:51 -0400 |
Msg# 1838 View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads Last Next |
Marco Recuay wrote: > [posted to rush.general] > > We're using version 102.42a8. > > I had already turned off log tailing like you'd mentioned, but reading > in the logs still happens progressively. The larger the log, the more > it slows down it seems. Granted, this was a 10mb log file (!), but the > way it was loading the log line by line seemed odd to me. It's trying to display it in a browser that's line oriented, but it should be reading the data in blocks of 4096. If its not, might be a bug in that version.. I'll check. You might try installing the more recent 102.42a9 (July 2008 release) on a single machine to see if it makes a difference. Which OS platform is this on? (Some platforms behave differently than others) -- Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed) Seriss Corporation Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/ Tel: (Tel# suppressed) Fax: (Tel# suppressed) Cel: (Tel# suppressed) |