From: Marco Recuay <marco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Log scrolling
   Date: Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:42:49 -0400
Msg# 1835
View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
I was wondering if it is possible to disable, or speed up, IRush log playback. Our Maya renders spit out an ungodly amount of info, which is good for problem-solving, but it takes a long time to reach the end of the file.

If we just navigate to the log location we can open it in a text editor immediately and read it there, but that is a cumbersome process to repeat often.

Disabling log tailing will stop the automatic scroll, but the log file is not loaded immediately, you still have to wait for the log to chug along to the bottom.

Any ideas?

Marco


   From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Log scrolling
   Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2009 00:00:37 -0400
Msg# 1836
View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
Marco Recuay wrote:
> I was wondering if it is possible to disable, or speed up, IRush log 
> playback. Our Maya renders spit out an ungodly amount of info, which is 
> good for problem-solving, but it takes a long time to reach the end of 
> the file.

	Yes; if by playback you mean the auto-tailing feature, you can
	disable that via "Edit -> Preferences -> Tail Logs"

> If we just navigate to the log location we can open it in a text editor 
> immediately and read it there, but that is a cumbersome process to 
> repeat often.

	Next release of irush will actually have a popup menu for
	alternately viewing the log in a separate editor (that you can set,
	eg. gvim/wordpad/TextEditor, etc)

> Disabling log tailing will stop the automatic scroll, but the log file 
> is not loaded immediately, you still have to wait for the log to chug 
> along to the bottom.
> 
> Any ideas?

	Hmm, which version of Rush are you running, and on which platform?

	You can find out inside irush via "Help -> About Irush", and include
	the version number here, which will be something like 102.42aXX

	There were a few versions where the log tailing feature was slower
	than other releases, so upgrading may help solve that.

	Given the version info, I can probably tell you if you can upgrade
	just the irush tool, without having to upgrade the rest.


-- 
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Seriss Corporation
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)

   From: Marco Recuay <marco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Log scrolling
   Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:53:28 -0400
Msg# 1837
View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
We're using version 102.42a8.

I had already turned off log tailing like you'd mentioned, but reading in the logs still happens progressively. The larger the log, the more it slows down it seems. Granted, this was a 10mb log file (!), but the way it was loading the log line by line seemed odd to me.

Marco

On 2009-04-13 21:00:37 -0700, Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)> said:

Hmm, which version of Rush are you running, and on which platform?

	You can find out inside irush via "Help -> About Irush", and include
	the version number here, which will be something like 102.42aXX

	There were a few versions where the log tailing feature was slower
	than other releases, so upgrading may help solve that.

	Given the version info, I can probably tell you if you can upgrade
	just the irush tool, without having to upgrade the rest.



   From: Greg Ercolano <erco@(email surpressed)>
Subject: Re: Log scrolling
   Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:39:51 -0400
Msg# 1838
View Complete Thread (4 articles) | All Threads
Last Next
Marco Recuay wrote:
> [posted to rush.general]
> 
> We're using version 102.42a8.
> 
> I had already turned off log tailing like you'd mentioned, but reading 
> in the logs still happens progressively. The larger the log, the more 
> it slows down it seems. Granted, this was a 10mb log file (!), but the 
> way it was loading the log line by line seemed odd to me.

	It's trying to display it in a browser that's line oriented,
	but it should be reading the data in blocks of 4096.

	If its not, might be a bug in that version.. I'll check.

	You might try installing the more recent 102.42a9 (July 2008 release)
	on a single machine to see if it makes a difference.

	Which OS platform is this on? (Some platforms behave differently
	than others)


-- 
Greg Ercolano, erco@(email surpressed)
Seriss Corporation
Rush Render Queue, http://seriss.com/rush/
Tel: (Tel# suppressed)
Fax: (Tel# suppressed)
Cel: (Tel# suppressed)